RAC Program Recovers Overpayments,
Plus Penalties, from Your Practice!

By Pam Nole, Director of Consulting Services, MediStar

Although we continue to see CMS regulatory dates come and go - and be revised and extended - one fact is clear: Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) are here to stay.

The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 made the RAC program permanent and effective on January 1, 2010, nationwide. Prior to that, there was a three year RAC demonstration in which CMS reported that the RACs had corrected approximately $992.7 million in overpayments, all collected from providers who had been erroneously compensated. Provider outreach has now occurred in every state, and all states are eligible for review.

Many physicians and practice administrators continue to have questions about RACs, but knowledge and awareness are strong tools to have in your arsenal to protect your practice integrity and reimbursements. (See related article in this issue.)

The bottom line is always, "Do the right thing because it’s the right thing to do." Be aware that if you don’t, you’ll be returning money to CMS programs, along with substantial penalties.



Also in this edition of MediStar Meducation Alert:

It Pays to Be Aware of the RAC Facts

Credentialing: A Necessity for a Successful Practice

CMS Updates Report on RAC Demo Appeals

Whistleblowing:
A Recent Case

According to government allegations, a Connecticut medical practice improperly billed the Medicare program for three services: treatments relating to back pain; physical therapy procedures that should not have been billed for the same patient at the same time; and more expensive office consultation visits, instead of less expensive new patient visits.

Allegations arose from a complaint against the practice that was filed in the United States District Court under the "whistleblower" provisions of the False Claims Act. The relator (whistleblower) was a retired physician who had treated some of the practice's former patients.

To settle the allegations, the practice agreed to pay $222,855, which covered conduct occurring from 2003 through 2008.

Provisions of the False Claims Act entitle the whistleblower to a percentage of the proceeds of any judgment or settlement recovered by the Government. The retired physician's share was $33,428.

It Pays to Be Aware of the RAC Facts

Being informed and prepared is the best way to avoid administrative headaches and financial penalties for your practice. Here are some basic facts that you should know about the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program, along with some helpful resources.

The purpose of the RAC program is to detect and correct past improper payments so that CMS can implement actions to prevent future improper payments.

If you bill on a fee-for-service basis, your claims are subject to RAC reviews.

RACs are paid on a contingency fee basis, and if they lose at any level of appeal, they must return their contingency fees.

Claims are reviewed on a post-payment basis. RACs, Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), carriers, and fiscal intermediaries all use the same Medicare policies: National Coverage Determination (NCD), Local Coverage Determination (LCD), and CMS manuals.

RACs cannot review claims prior to October 1, 2007. The maximum look-back period is 3 years.

There are two types of audits:

  • Automated, for which no additional documentation is needed.
  • Complex, for which additional documentation is required. Detailed review results follow all complex reviews.

There are differences between RAC and other post-payment reviews:

  • RACs issue demand letters.
  • The RAC discussion period is outside the normal appeal process.
  • CMS approves issues prior to widespread reviews.
  • RACs post approved issues on their websites.

The RAC collection process is the same for all identified overpayments: the explanation of benefits (EOB) or denial letter uses code N432; remittance advice is issued; and overpayments are recovered by offset unless the provider submits a check or a valid appeal. Providers may also apply for an extended repayment plan.

RAC will accept imaged medical records on a CD or DVD. 2010 documentation limits have not been established for professional services or for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS), but they have been established for institutional providers as follows:

  • One percent of Medicare claims for the previous year, divided into 8 periods (45 days)
  • Based on Tax Identification Number (TIN) and Zip Code

Caps have been set in terms of additional documentation requests (ADRs):

  • Through March 2010, the cap was 200 ADRs per 45 days for all providers and suppliers.
  • From April through September 2010, providers and suppliers who bill in excess of 100,000 claims to Medicare (per TIN) will have a cap of 300 ADRs per 45 days.
  • CMS will allow RACs to request to exceed cap on a case by case basis, and affected providers will be notified prior to receiving additional requests.

How to Be Prepared

  • Know what improper payments were found by RACs by visiting their websites or RAC Overview.
  • Know what improper payments have been found in the Office of Inspector General (OIG) Reports and Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) Reports.
  • Keep track of denied claims.
  • Look for patterns.
  • Take corrective actions to avoid improper payments.
  • Perform self-audits of your provider claims. If a self-audit results in improper payments, report it to the claims processing contractor. If the contractor agrees with the audit result, those claims will be excluded from the RAC review.

Should You Find Yourself in a RAC Review Process

  • Let the RAC know where to direct its letters requesting additional documentation.
  • Respond to all RAC requests for documentation.
  • Confirm RAC receipt of your ADRs.

MOST IMPORTANTLY, if you disagree with the RAC determination, do not stop with sending a discussion letter! Make sure that all your appeals are timely - within 120 days after the issue of the demand letter.

For more information about the overpayment determination process, visit Provider Options.

New issues for Region A are posted at Diversified Collection Services (DCS).

Credentialing: A Necessity for a Successful Practice

By Katarina Tomin, Director of Credentials XpressSM, MediStar

Medical credentialing is the process of establishing the qualifications of licensed healthcare providers by assessing their backgrounds to confirm their legitimacy. Because insurance carriers want to select and retain competent providers to deliver services to their plan members, each carrier must verify the qualifications of every provider who applies for participation in its panels. Without proper credentialing, a provider cannot participate in various insurance plans and hence cannot receive compensation from the carrier for delivering services to members of those plans. If your practice does not have providers with active participation status in multiple Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) or Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), then you are limiting your ability to attract patients. While credentialing tends to be a cumbersome and daunting process, it is a necessity if you depend on compensation from private and government insurers.

The credentialing process includes verifying education, post-graduate training, hospital staff privileges, and professional licenses, as well as checking Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Controlled Dangerous Substance (CDS) resources for background information, such as claims filed against individual providers. Sometimes an insurance carrier will visit your office to conduct a review, referencing a checklist provided by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHCO) or the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), depending on the type of your facility. NCQA is an independent agency that has spearheaded the mission of accountability and value in healthcare since 1990. This committee also sets the standards for insurance carriers in order to ensure that they are providing quality services and products to their members. NCQA practices are the standards that most insurance companies follow when credentialing their provider panels.

In addition to initially credentialing providers, insurance carriers re-credential providers every two or three years, depending on the company. It is important for you to pay close attention to all communication that comes from insurance panels in which your practice providers belong, because missing a re-credentialing deadline may require re-starting the credentialing process from the beginning. This in turn results in lost revenue for a considerable amount of time, because inactive providers will not be paid by the carrier for serving patients until the credentialing process is completed once again. While initial credentialing can take several months, re-credentialing is a relatively simple process designed to ensure uninterrupted compensation for services delivered to plan subscribers. By staying on top of your credentialing deadlines, you can avoid disrupting your revenue stream.

CMS Updates Report on RAC Demo Appeals

Washington Report, Capitol Associates

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has updated its 2008 report on Medicare's Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) demonstration program to include information through March 9, 2010. According to the report, providers appealed 12.7 percent of RAC determinations from the inception of the three-year demonstration through March 9, of which 8.2 percent were overturned on appeal. There are several data differences between this update and the January 2009 report. Explanations for the data differences are as follows:

  • The number of claims with overpayment determinations has increased from 525,133 in the January 2009 report to 598,238, as a result of additional claims being manually included that were not entered into the RAC data warehouse prior to the end of the demonstration.
  • The number of claims where the provider appealed has significantly decreased from the 118,051 reported in January 2009 to 76,073, due to several factors. The previous method of generating this figure counted claims appealed to multiple levels at each level of appeal. The revised method counts an appealed claim once, regardless of the number of levels of appeal.
  • Duplicate claims were identified in the previous data, and they have been removed.

Provider Appeals of RAC-Initiated Overpayments: Cumulative through 3/9/10

Number of claims with overpayment determinations

598,238

Number of claims where provider appealed

76,073

Number of claims with appeal decisions in provider’s favor

48,993

Percentage of appealed claims with a decision in provider’s favor

64.4 percent

Percentage of claims overturned on appeal

8.2 percent

As the above chart notes, nearly 65 percent of appealed claims were resolved with a decision in FAVOR of the provider.


If you received this newsletter directly from MediStar, you are currently subscribed and will automatically receive future issues. If you wish to forward this newsletter to a colleague, please feel free to do so. If you received this email from a colleague and wish to subscribe, click here.

To be removed from our distribution list, click here.

MediStar · 12 Cambridge Drive · Trumbull, CT 06611
Phone: (203) 372-1900 · Fax: (203) 372-2600 · info@medistarbilling.com

© 2010 Medi-Claim Services, Inc. All rights reserved.